
Scroll down to register or contact us today for a no-obligation quote!
‍
This two-day course introduces the principles and practices of Information Architecture and demonstrates how IA supports knowledge management, enterprise content management, search, user experience, and modern AI solutions. The course emphasizes how content models, metadata, taxonomies, ontologies, governance, and retrieval design improve the performance, trustworthiness, usability, and explainability of AI systems, especially generative AI, retrieval-augmented generation, copilots, intelligent search,
and agentic AI solutions.
How does this compare with our CKS - KM & Enterprise AI program? Check out this comparision guide and contact your KMIÂ rep for questions. Details here...
‍
Upon successful completion, participants will be able to:
No later than three business days before class, the instructor will provide a one-page Project Worksheet containing:
Each class participant must familiarize themselves with this information.
Estimated prerequisite reading time: 4–6 hours. The instructor brief will be supplied by the instructor at least one week before the class.
NIST AI RMF Playbook: selected suggested actions related to documentation, data quality, monitoring, accountability, and governance.
W3C SKOS Reference: for participants who need deeper technical detail on machine-readable knowledge organization systems.
Microsoft RAG solution design and evaluation guidance: for participants responsible for retrieval architecture or evaluation.
Organizational policies covering data classification, records retention, privacy, security, AI use, and responsible AI.
The capstone is not a separate project introduced at the end of the course. It is assembled progressively through the exercises. Each exercise produces a required blueprint section. Participants work on the same selected use case throughout both days, allowing the final deliverable to emerge through structured iteration rather than after-hours reconstruction.
The agenda assumes 7.5 scheduled hours per day, including breaks and lunch, and approximately 6.25 hours of active instruction and workshop time each day
‍
Every exercise is completed against the same participant-selected AI use case.
Exercises use structured templates to prevent participants from spending class time formatting documents.
Participants create minimum viable designs suitable for decision-making—not production-level technical specifications.
Each exercise includes individual work, peer critique, instructor feedback, and a required revision checkpoint.
Participants must record assumptions, evidence gaps, dependencies, and unresolved decisions rather than inventing missing facts.
Exercises explicitly distinguish IA responsibilities from data engineering, AI engineering, security, legal, records, and model-risk responsibilities.
No confidential client or organizational information is required; participants may anonymize sources and stakeholders.
The capstone is not introduced as a separate project at the end of the course. Each exercise produces a required blueprint section. Participants use the same selected AI use case throughout both days so the final deliverable emerges through structured iteration.
Purpose: Clarify the business purpose and information context before designing IA artifacts.
Participant work:
Describe the AI solution and intended business outcome.
Identify primary users, tasks, decisions, and questions the solution must support.
Define required knowledge, scope boundaries, assumptions, exclusions, and constraints.
Record privacy, security, regulatory, records, and responsible AI considerations.
Required output:Â Blueprint Section 1: AI use case, users, decisions, knowledge needs, boundaries, assumptions, and constraints.
Purpose: Identify and prioritize the repositories, applications, records, and expert knowledge required by the AI use case.
Participant work:
List priority sources and systems of record.
Capture source owner, format, authority, access, sensitivity, freshness, lifecycle, and usage rights.
Identify duplicated, obsolete, conflicting, restricted, or unsupported sources.
Map each source to the tasks or decisions it supports.
Required output:Â Blueprint Section 2: Prioritized source inventory and ownership map.
Purpose: Determine whether priority sources are suitable for AI ingestion, retrieval, grounding, and citation.
Participant work:
Score accuracy, authority, completeness, currency, structure, metadata quality, provenance, searchability, and retrieval suitability.
Assess permissions, sensitivity, retention, external-use restrictions, and AI approval status.
Capture evidence for each score rather than relying on unsupported judgment.
Prioritize remediation actions, dependencies, and unresolved questions.
Required output:Â Blueprint Section 3: Readiness findings, material gaps, risk priorities, and remediation actions.
Purpose: Create a conceptual model that gives the AI solution clear content types, components, relationships, identifiers, and lifecycle states.
Participant work:
Identify priority content types and business objects.
Define reusable components such as title, summary, purpose, audience, procedure steps, source, and related content.
Model relationships among policies, procedures, standards, FAQs, products, services, decisions, and experts.
Document lifecycle, versioning, reuse, citation, and chunking implications.
Required output:Â Blueprint Section 4: Conceptual content model and relationship definitions.
Purpose: Define the minimum metadata required for trustworthy discovery, filtering, ranking, access, citation, and governance.
Participant work:
Define field name, definition, purpose, data type, allowed values, source, requirement level, owner, and validation rule.
Include descriptive, structural, administrative, security, rights, provenance, retention, and AI-use metadata.
Specify source authority, approval for AI use, review and expiration dates, audience, jurisdiction, and retrieval priority.
Document how metadata supports access filtering, explainability, citation, and auditability.
Required output:Â Blueprint Section 5: Metadata, classification, provenance, and access-control schema.
Purpose: Create a minimum viable controlled vocabulary and determine where richer semantic relationships are justified.
Participant work:
Define preferred terms, synonyms, acronyms, non-preferred terms, and scope notes.
Create broader/narrower relationships and relevant facets.
Identify important entity types and relationships.
State whether taxonomy alone is sufficient or whether ontology or knowledge-graph capabilities are needed.
Required output:Â Blueprint Section 6: Taxonomy, synonyms, facets, entities, and semantic-layer recommendations.
Purpose: Translate IA decisions into requirements for search, RAG, copilots, assistants, and agents.
Participant work:
Select retrieval methods and define filtering and ranking rules.
Document chunking assumptions, context assembly, source authority, and citation requirements.
Design facets, answer structure, confidence cues, 'show your source' behavior, escalation, and feedback.
Define source-grounded prompt components and restrictions.
Required output:Â Blueprint Section 7: Retrieval, grounding, citation, prompt context, interaction, and feedback requirements.
Purpose: Define the accountability and processes required to maintain IA artifacts and approved knowledge sources throughout the AI lifecycle.
Participant work:
Assign owners, stewards, decision rights, reviewers, and escalation authorities.
Define create, review, approve, publish, reuse, change, retire, and archive workflows.
Set governance requirements for content, metadata, taxonomies, knowledge bases, prompt libraries, and retrieval configurations.
Establish review cycles, quality controls, issue management, and change approval.
Required output:Â Blueprint Section 8: Governance roles, RACI, policies, workflows, controls, and review cycles.
Purpose: Connect IA quality to responsible AI controls, operational evaluation, and measurable business outcomes.
Participant work:
Create an IA-related AI risk and control matrix.
Define tests for relevance, groundedness, completeness, citation accuracy, freshness, access leakage, and answer usefulness.
Establish KPIs, thresholds, monitoring cadence, owners, and escalation criteria.
Identify business value measures and user trust indicators.
Required output:Â Blueprint Section 9: Risk-control framework, evaluation plan, KPIs, thresholds, and monitoring responsibilities.
Earn the CKS in Information Architecture for AIÂ Solutions
‍(2-day class plus online "KM Foundation" course for New Students).

Standard rate for new students: $1,995
Past Grads (CKM/CKS): $1,595*
Package includes the 2-day Master Class, Course Workbook, KM Foundation Online Program, Online Exam, Certificate/Badge, and "Knowledge Hub" access to new instructional videos on KM and related topics -
no expiration.
And - you get the original Taxonomy Design self-paced course (free!) as part of your package -
10 hours of bonus material.
KMI Tip:Â Bundle this program with our CKS - KMÂ &Â Enterprise AI course for big savings!
Availablie as a live, 2-day class and the new self-paced version launches soon.
‍*Past Grads (CKP/CKM/CKS) may bypass the "KM Foundation" program and start with the Master Class.
Contact KMI today for your special quote.

Call (US): 703-327-7096
Or email: training@kminstitute.org
‍We are standing by to help!
3554 Founders Club Drive, Sarasota, FL, 34240 (USA)
Phone: (US) 1-703-327-7096
Training:training@kminstitute.org
General Questions:info@kminstitute.org